fbpx

Quality up in the face of drought

Darnall Feedlot earns back-to-back Quality Focus Awards from CAB

 

by Jill Dunkel

What’s better than winning first place? Doing that three out of four years, including two in a row and despite one of the worst droughts in history.

That’s exactly what Darnall Feedlot, Harrisburg, Neb., managed to do with Quality Focus Awards in 2010, 2012 and 2013 for Certified Angus Beef LLC partners with more than 15,000-head capacity. This year’s mark of 49% Certified Angus Beef ® (CAB®) brand and Prime shot past the previous year’s 40% and 33% in 2010.

The time span is for cattle fed from June through the end of May.

This year, Darnall Feedlot managed to increase the grade while dealing with a harsh climate and high feed prices.

“Ranchers around here changed some management systems because of drought,” explains Gary Darnall, who manages the yard with his son Lane. “Many weaned early to reduce nutrient requirements on the ranch and to try and salvage as many cows as possible.”

That led to an influx of light-weight calves, some as light as 300 pounds, and a few, even lighter. Darnall put them on a grower ration, making sure they consumed good protein and energy, and grew the cattle until they were five-weights.

“At that point, we started treating them like other cattle in the feedyard,” he says.

In the process, Darnall realized first-hand what research has proven before: early-weaned calves have some advantages.

“Yes, we did get better carcass quality than we normally do,” he says. “I think it’s because of having a higher energy diet earlier in the life of the feeding period.”

Gary and Emilie Darnall accepted the award at the Certified Angus Beef LLC annual conference in Palm Desert, Calif., Sept. 18-20.

Cattle in the family’s yard are ultrasound-scanned and a projected marketing date is set as a matter of routine. With that system, Darnall says some of the calves in his program brought $4-plus-per-hundredweight (cwt.) in premiums. Those premiums were a blessing considering the cost of feed.

“It was high priced corn and as a result, these cattle lost money,” says Darnall, basing his calculations on their value as feeder cattle. But the premiums helped buffer the large losses other cattle feeders endured. Some of the cattle were off his Darnall Ranch, while others were from ranchers who retain ownership.

“We are fortunate in the fact we have ranchers that retain ownership with high-performance cattle. We’re very fortunate to be able to feed those cattle,” he says.

Most of the customers represent repeat business, some feeding with him for 10 years or more.

“The ranchers come back, year in and year out, so they have a program set up. They don’t vary much. But through retained ownership, they have definitely had a positive profit margin,” he says. “Now, last year they probably had red ink on the bottom line, like all of us did. But if you average that over a period of 10 years, they’ll be on the positive side of it.”

Looking at the next six months, Darnall says many ranchers have weaned early once again and are anxious to get into new-crop corn and the feeder-friendly prices that come with it.

You may also like

Drought Impact and Cattle Industry Dynamics

Drought Impact and Cattle Industry Dynamics

As drought conditions persist across much of cattle country, farmers and ranchers are at a pivotal juncture in the cattle industry’s landscape. What impact does this prolonged dry spell have on the nation’s herd numbers? When will heifer retention begin? How will industry dynamics influence the spring bull sale season?

You, Your Cows and Their Feed

You, Your Cows and Their Feed

Expert guidance from Dusty Abney at Cargill Animal Nutrition shares essential strategies for optimizing cattle nutrition during droughts, leading to healthier herds and increased profitability in challenging conditions.

Marketing Feeder Cattle: Begin with the End in Mind

Marketing Feeder Cattle: Begin with the End in Mind

Understanding what constitutes value takes an understanding of beef quality and yield thresholds that result in premiums and/or discounts. Generally, packers look for cattle that will garner a high quality grade and have excellent red meat yield, but realistically very few do both exceptionally well.

Old ranch, new ways for CAB award winner

When Mother Nature gets mean, new technology and high-quality goals gain the upper hand

 

by Steve Suther

Joe Mayer has always looked for better ways. That’s second nature to anyone whose family has made a living on harsh land for generations. All who thrive on the 35,000 acres that comprise Mayer Ranch near Guymon, Okla., must continually adapt.

For his example that proves high-quality ideals and cattle can flourish here, Mayer earned the 2013 Certified Angus Beef LLC (CAB) Commercial Commitment to Excellence Award, presented at the CAB annual conference in Palm Desert, Calif., Sept. 18-20.

Once part of The Comancheria, Mexico and Texas, the Cimarron Strip may have looked like its 19th century nickname, No Man’s Land, when Mayer’s great grandfather rode across it in 1873. Bound from Savannah, Mo., to manage a branch of the XIT Ranch near Texline, Texas, he would cross the strip many times in the years ahead, trailing cattle to Dodge City, Kan.

When settlement was opened as part of Oklahoma Territory in the 1890s, the family had already been ranching there seven years.

Mayer grew up on a part of the ranch at nearby Hardesty, Okla., moving to the Guymon ranch to ramrod a new part of the spread while earning a degree at Panhandle State University where he met and married MaryAnne.

All the cattle were straightbred Herefords then, but calving ease was a common concern. That led to the first use of Angus bulls on heifers a few years later, though the black baldies were discounted at auctions.

Early adapters of artificial insemination (AI), the family tried most of the continental breeds before coming back to exclusively Angus 20 years ago.

“We follow the market,” Mayer says, “and that’s why we went with Angus.”

In 1993, he started buying bulls that would sire uniform performance and quality, from Gardiner Angus Ranch, Ashland, Kan.

“They were paying attention to marbling before anybody else even knew it was going to be important,” Mayer says.

Before that, he produced for the prevailing commodity market and went about the daily business of ranching while he and MaryAnne raised Katie, now an attorney in Colorado, and Paul and Margie, who are part of the ranch business today.

“We fed a lot of cattle, and all kinds, but that was back before grids and none of that mattered,” Mayer says. Now that it mattered, carcass data through the Gardiners and U.S. Premium Beef helped him identify and cull the tail-enders.

He sends calves to CAB partner yard Triangle H, near Garden City, Kan.

“Joe has the right ideas on how to work with leading genetics to send us some of the best calves we’ve fed,” owner-manager Sam Hands says. “And we’re working together to help take that to a new level.”

The straightbred Angus herd of 1,400 cows conformed to plans, as once leading-edge outlier genetics became the norm.

Mayer tries to keep expected progeny differences (EPDs) balanced, but he pushes the top end of the $B index that combines EPDs for growth and carcass traits with economic data. Bulls for heifers must be in the top 1% for calving ease.

But drought created new challenges by 2010 when culling had to go much deeper than expected.

“We sold the oldest and then the next oldest,” Mayer says, noting finally, all mature cows had to be sold. “It tore my heart out.”

And it still wasn’t enough when 2011 opened up even drier.

“It got down to where it was hurting us to even keep bred heifers, but we had spent too much money and time, worked too hard to build our genetics to just lose that,” Mayer says. “We started looking for some place to go, and maybe we should have left here.”

Anyone would have had doubts when grass that survived the Dust Bowl began dying.

“We started driving until we found something green,” he says. But the inside insight came from Mayer’s AI specialist, Doug Tenhouse, originally from Illinois. He knew of a 1,640-acre ranch for sale in the Green Hills near Unionville, Mo.

“We closed on a deal and shipped cows two days later,” Mayer says. Those 2011 first-calf heifers are now the oldest cows in a herd of 1,090, and 624 of them in Missouri. That’s only half the herd it could be.

“If we could ever get a rain here—and it would take two or three years—but we could run a couple thousand,” he says. “It has got to start doing a whole lot of raining first.”

Meanwhile, calves from this ultra-culled herd now make 70% CAB and 15% Prime. Mayer plans to push that to 25% Prime in the near term.

He’ll cull any cow that can’t produce a CAB calf, and let technology ensure the repopulated herd can gain and grade at the very top.

Planning for precipitation to return to its 18- to 20-inch annual average, last fall Mayer bought 500 heifers from five ranch dispersions. When the drought didn’t break, he turned to realism and a new tool, the GeneMax™ (GMX) genomics test from CAB.

Gate-cut sampling from each set identified the top two strings, from which all heifers were tested. Only those scoring above 80 on the 99-point GMX scale were kept in each case.

“We thought at that level, they should be able to produce a CAB or Prime,” Mayer says. The test cost $17, but prorated over a six-calf productive life, “it seemed reasonable.”

Expectations are high every day. By the time calves finish in the feedlot, “our steers and feeder heifers need to weigh at least 3 pounds for each day they live,” he explains.

When 2,000 cows are in on that plan, producing only CAB and Prime calves, Mayer may allow himself a moment of satisfaction to enjoy the better days. He’ll probably order a steak, medium rare…

You may also like

You, Your Cows and Their Feed

You, Your Cows and Their Feed

Expert guidance from Dusty Abney at Cargill Animal Nutrition shares essential strategies for optimizing cattle nutrition during droughts, leading to healthier herds and increased profitability in challenging conditions.

Marketing Feeder Cattle: Begin with the End in Mind

Marketing Feeder Cattle: Begin with the End in Mind

Understanding what constitutes value takes an understanding of beef quality and yield thresholds that result in premiums and/or discounts. Generally, packers look for cattle that will garner a high quality grade and have excellent red meat yield, but realistically very few do both exceptionally well.

Kansas Ranchers Recognized for Sustainability Efforts

Kansas Ranchers Recognized for Sustainability Efforts

Kansas’ Wharton 3C Ranch thrives despite droughts, winning the CAB 2023 Sustainability award. The data-driven, quality-focused approach of first-generation ranchers, Shannon and Rusty Wharton, yields 100% CAB cattle. Their commitment to sustainability and industry collaboration sets a bright future for the cattle business.

How can beef compete

Higher prices bring higher expectations

 

by Miranda Reiman

Eleven to one—those were the odds the beef industry was up against for two decades.

“We got $10 in new spending over that 20 years, meanwhile our pork and poultry competitors got $110,” said Nevil Speer, an animal scientist at Western Kentucky University. “You can’t grow an industry without new revenue coming in, and we basically worked in a stagnant industry for 20 years.”

Speer presented as part of the Harlan Ritchie Beef Symposium during Midwest American Society of Animal Science meetings in Des Moines, Iowa in March.

Beef struggled with health perception issues, convenience woes and the challenge of being the most expensive protein in the meat case, he said.

Then, the independent sector orientation began to adjust for mutual good.

“We began to understand that we need to work together in this industry,” Speer said.

That lent itself to more branded programs and supply-chain alliances.

“Today we’re averaging somewhere around 12% to 15% branded sales on a weekly basis,” he said. “This push will probably continue in the years ahead.”

As a result, grid and other negotiated sales make up 75% of all fed-cattle marketings today.

Part of that also comes from increased competition for feeder cattle, and the need to recoup premiums paid on cattle coming into the feedyards.

“They’ve begun to implement more and more supply management over the last 10 years, and those are strategic business decision,” Speer said. “If we can find cattle that meet some end-user specification and then match our inputs and do that securely, we begin to kind of distance ourselves from the rivalry of fighting it out in a commodity market.”

That’s not only happening on the cattle side of the business, but once it’s processed into beef, too.

An estimated two-thirds of retail marketings are “out front sales,” Speer said. “They’re not spot sales.”

“What’s happening is that we are continuing to have more need for efficiency of movement, precision, to meet consumer needs,” he said. “We need the right cattle, the right products, at the right time and the right place, and that’s ultimately because we want to offer high-quality, highly competitive products with consistent, predictable turnover.”

That’s especially important as beef looks to compete with much cheaper alternatives. Beef is running at 240% the price of chicken and 140% that of pork.

“We’re on the upper edge of where we’ve ever been,” Speer said. “At what point do consumers begin to push back? I don’t know; they’ve shown amazing resilience and continue to do so, but this is a concern.”

“Certainly, higher price equals higher expectations,” he said.

The apparent solution is more teamwork.

“If we can supply high-quality product on a consistent basis, then we create demand,” Speer said. “Then the demand feeds back into the supply and it’s really a network-type of perspective where we create an entire ecosystem around a business, and ultimately we get new value creation.”

To those who say at some point the industry will have too much Prime or Choice beef, Speer counters, “If we can over-deliver that in an efficient way, and be more price-competitive with a quality product, I say let’s go. That means more opportunities in the beef industry.”

The National Beef Quality Audits, along with numerous other studies, show that meeting consumer demand sets the industry up for success.

“We have pretty good evidence that as we increase cooperation and responsive to consumers, we do a much better job in this industry,” he said.

You may also like

$100,000 Up for Grabs with 2024 Colvin Scholarships

$100,000 Up for Grabs with 2024 Colvin Scholarships

Certified Angus Beef is offering $100,000 in scholarships for agricultural college students through the 2024 Colvin Scholarship Fund. Aspiring students passionate about agriculture and innovation, who live in the U.S. or Canada, are encouraged to apply before the April 30 deadline. With the Colvin Scholarship Fund honoring Louis M. “Mick” Colvin’s legacy, Certified Angus Beef continues its commitment to cultivating future leaders in the beef industry.

Raised with Respect™ Cattle Care Campaign Launched This Fall

Raised with Respect™ Cattle Care Campaign Launched This Fall

Raised with Respect™ was developed as part of a strategic cattle care partnership between Sysco and CAB. The collaboration focuses on supporting farmers and ranchers, equipping them with continuing education to stay current on best management practices and helping to increase consumer confidence in beef production.

Drought Impact and Cattle Industry Dynamics

Drought Impact and Cattle Industry Dynamics

As drought conditions persist across much of cattle country, farmers and ranchers are at a pivotal juncture in the cattle industry’s landscape. What impact does this prolonged dry spell have on the nation’s herd numbers? When will heifer retention begin? How will industry dynamics influence the spring bull sale season?

Uniform cattle increase profit potential

 

by Miranda Reiman

John Simons ranches with his family near Enning, S.D., where they’ve focused on reducing variability in their Angus-based cowherd for the last 20 years.

“If your calves all look the same, they’re just a pretty package,” he says. “And pretty sells.”

Sticking with one breed and bloodline for several years lets Simons produce calves that not only have the same phenotype but also perform similarly in the feedlot and on the rail.

“They might not all be brothers, but they’ll be related,” he says, noting the family only switches bulls when they start retaining heifers and need to infuse a divergent bloodline.

Salebarn studies routinely prove uniformity in weight and cattle type mean premiums at auction, but the rancher really noticed the difference when he began working closely with Haverhals Feedlot near Hudson, S.D., a decade ago. Simons has retained partial ownership on steer and heifer calves ever since.

“This has been an eye-opening experience for me,” he says.

A recent analysis spanning nine years and 67,000 calves fed in the Iowa Tri-County Steer Carcass Futurity shows finished cattle in the same pen differ in average value by nearly $700 from top to bottom.

“Variations within a feedlot pen make management and marketing a great challenge, especially when selling on a carcass merit basis,” says the technical bulletin published by Certified Angus Beef LLC.

In the study, receiving weight varied by 401 pounds (lb.), and the gap in finished weight widened to 546 lb.

“The more uniform a group, the more likely that a feeder will pass some premium back to the producer,” says Kelly Bruns, South Dakota State University animal scientist. “It saves them time and pen space, because they may not have to sort these groups.”

Breaking the data into the most uniform quarter compared to least shows a much tighter set of cattle. The top group sold within a 25-day window and had a 388-lb. average difference in finished weight. That’s compared to the most variable 25%, which sold during a 56-day period and had a 750-lb. average span in harvest weight.

Cattle with similar performance potential allow feeders to make blanket decisions about feeding and implant strategies, Bruns says.

“As they try to capture value on a carcass-based pricing system, being more uniform is certainly a benefit,” he says.

As feeders try to hit a “sweet spot” on many grids, the fewer outliers, the better.

The carcass value disparity in the least variable quarter was $148 per head, compared to the most variable, which had an average carcass value variation of $329 per head.

Bruns says the two easiest ways to create a more like set of calves are related to age and genetics.

“If we can keep calving window tight, it’s huge,” he says. Technology like synchronized artificial insemination (AI) can help, but anybody can cull cows that are continually late calvers.

Good herd management helps narrow that window, too.

“Proper nutrition and management in the months before [a rancher] decided to turn out bulls becomes pretty important, so that they’ll settle in their first heat,” Bruns says.

After that it’s about selecting like sires.

“If they have the ability to choose bulls with similar parentage or at least similar genetic potential, it helps,” he says.

That’s been the key to Simons’ successful transition.

“I was so poor when I started, I couldn’t afford to pay attention to what kind of bulls I had,” he laughs. Now they invest at least five years of careful study in the next bloodline they want to use, and always look to buy the top bulls they can afford.

“Once we started buying the good ones, we had to continue to do it,” he says. “Because if we didn’t, we weren’t improving.”

Simons gained cowherd consistency as an unintentional secondary benefit. “I want the calves to be uniform, because that’s what I sell, but my cows have been more uniform and more predictable.”

Plus, it has reduced on-ranch labor.

“When one is ready to go, they’re all ready to go,” he says. So there’s little sorting and the next segment is happy with his calf crop.

“If they like one, they like them all,” he says.

You may also like

Drought Impact and Cattle Industry Dynamics

Drought Impact and Cattle Industry Dynamics

As drought conditions persist across much of cattle country, farmers and ranchers are at a pivotal juncture in the cattle industry’s landscape. What impact does this prolonged dry spell have on the nation’s herd numbers? When will heifer retention begin? How will industry dynamics influence the spring bull sale season?

Nebraska Ranch Receives Certified Angus Beef Commercial Award

Nebraska Ranch Receives Certified Angus Beef Commercial Award

Troy Anderson, managing a Nebraska ranch, focuses on breeding thriving maternal cows that will grade premium Choice and Prime, while respecting livestock, people and land. Anderson Cattle receives the 2023 CAB Commitment to Excellence Award. Their journey includes improving genetics, feeding home-raised and purchased calves and using data for better breeding decisions, all with a bottom-line approach.

Showing Up, Every Day

Showing Up, Every Day

Thirty-five thousand cattle may fill these pens, but it’s the Gabel family who set the tone for each day. Steve and Audrey persistently create a people-first culture, echoed by their son Case and daughter Christie, who work alongside them in the yard office. The Gabel’s drive to effectively hit the high-quality beef target earned Magnum Feedyard the CAB 2023 Feedyard Commitment to Excellence award.

Earlier this week Mark told you a herd bull is a big investment, and getting more so all the time. Since you’ll be putting so many of your proverbial eggs into that one expensive basket, you want to make sure he’s the right guy for the job. But with so many numbers and figures to sort out, do you ever feel overwhelmed?

Looking for a bull like this?

We get it. That’s why we asked Mark for his top tips for bull buying. Here’s what he had to say:

Consider your females.

Will these bulls be used on heifers or mature cows? If the bull is going to be used heavily on heifers, more importance should be put on calving ease. That’s a priority, where it might not be at the top of the list if you’re breeding him solely to older cows.

He encourages cattlemen to consider the Calving Ease Direct (CED) EPD as much as the Birth Weight (BW) EPD because “it truly is a better indicator of the trait” they are trying to achieve.

“Calving ease takes into account birth weight, but it also accounts for things like gestation length,” Mark says.

Data is good, but EPDs are better.

'Tis the season...

“Too many times,” he says, “an auctioneer will call out, ‘This bull has a 78-pound birth weight. Until I know what the EPD is, I couldn’t care less about his actual birth weight.”

While actual data — whether it’s a birth weight, an ultrasound scan or genomic results — is one piece of the puzzle, its usefulness can’t compare to EPDs.

“Those EPDs have all of that information in there,” Mark says. “Use them — they work.”

Think of the calves.

Of course, in any production management decision, the desired final product should be considered. What’s the hope or your plan for these calves?

Will they be replacement heifers, or go to the feedlot? If it’s a combination of the 2, Mark says the producer should take a balance trait approach and look at both maternal and carcass traits.

Even for cattlemen who sell their entire calf crop at weaning, it’s important to look beyond that point.

“They need to be paying attention to carcass traits because I can guarantee you the buyers of those calves are paying attention. Feedlots today know who’s producing those better calves and who’s producing the not-so-good ones. So it really makes good sense for the cow-calf guy to be paying attention, too,” he says.

That’s why Mark is a firm believer in the dollar-value ($Value) tools, multi-trait selection indexes expressed in dollars per head that assist beef producers by adding simplicity to genetic selection decisions. The $Value is an estimate of how future progeny of each sire are expected to perform, on average, compared to progeny of other sires in the database if the sires were randomly mated to cows and if calves were exposed to the same environment.

He thinks the Weaned Calf Value ($W) and the Beef Value ($B) are especially significant to cattlemen. The first is a maternal index that takes into account birth weight, weaning weight, milk and mature cow size. The second represents the feedlot and carcass value of the potential bull.

Numbers aren’t everything.

While EPDs are one of the most valuable tools at a cattleman’s disposal,Mark urges producers not to forget the big picture.

“You’ve still got to go look at that bull,” he says. “Make sure you are comfortable with his structure, his disposition and how well he’ll fit into your environment and operation.

“The numbers, while they’re great, still don’t take into account some of these other traits that you need to be out there in the pen doing your own evaluation on.”

 Want to read more about specific EPD recommendations for cow-calf producers who want to more effectively target the CAB brand? Check out our Best Practices Manual.

DNA test for gain, grade available soon

Value-based tool will help commercial producers better select, manage Angus cattle

 

by Steve Suther

A new DNA test for marbling and post-weaning growth will soon help cattle producers better hit the high-quality beef target. The tool, set to debut in early 2012, will be made available under a development agreement between Angus Genetics Inc. (AGI) and Pfizer Animal Genetics, the companies announced.

Exclusive marketing rights are reserved for Certified Angus Beef LLC (CAB), in line with the company’s continuing effort to increase the supply of cattle for the brand. AGI and CAB are subsidiaries of the American Angus Association.

The test is being designed for use on high-percentage, commercial Angus cattle sired by registered bulls, according to AGI President Bill Bowman. “It should provide a valuable tool to increase the precision of selection decisions at the ranch, as well as differentiating value for the feedlot,” he said.

Test results will take the form of an index, which is being finalized this fall, said Mark McCully, CAB assistant vice president for supply.

“There have been lots of advancements in the purebred cattle industry utilizing DNA for selection,” Bowman said. “But this will be the first test at a price point that is economically feasible for commercial cattlemen. The American Angus Association, its subsidiaries and Pfizer Animal Genetics are excited to partner on bringing this technology to market for the users of Angus genetics.”

Scott Bormann, business director, Pfizer Animal Genetics, says the development of this product is another example of the strategic partnership between the companies.

“We appreciate the American Angus Association and its affiliates continuing to foster innovation in the field of genetic evaluation,” Bormann said. “The forward-thinking collaboration should result in a DNA test that helps continue to advance genomic use and application, the Angus breed, as well as meet consumer demand for high-quality beef.”

McCully noted what are expected to be popular uses for the tool. “This is going to allow for more accurate replacement heifer selection and targeted management in feeding Angus cattle,” he said. “With demand for high-quality beef at an all-time high, commercial cattlemen will soon gain a greater ability to identify those cattle most able to access premiums in that marketplace.”

CAB seeks clarity in GIPSA rules

April 15, 2011

Certified Angus Beef LLC (CAB) President John Stika sent a letter to USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack in late March to explain the branded beef company’s stand against current wording in rule changes proposed by the Grain Inspection Packers & Stockyards Administration (GIPSA).

The USDA agency last summer unveiled its proposed rule changes that govern livestock marketing. A divide soon appeared within the beef industry over lengthening the comment period, and whether the proposed changes themselves needed changes. “Fairness” debates began from coffee shops to editorials and letters to USDA expressing either support or concern over vague language.

At a USDA/Justice Dept. workshop on competition in Fort Collins, Colo., last August 27, in an open letter to Angus producers and in subsequent comments to GIPSA, Stika expressed concern over unintended consequences and called for further study because there had been very little.

By the end of the extended November deadline and after two private economic analyses quantifying costs and concerns, more than 60,000 comments had come in to GIPSA. Vilsack then announced USDA would conduct its own economic impact study. 

“The issue seemed to fade a little, but in fact it has not gone away,” Stika said. “We owe it to Angus producers and all of our licensed partners across the beef industry to maintain an active role in helping USDA craft the best possible clarifications to the proposed GIPSA rules.”

The letter stated, “Pleasing the consumer is the single most effective and sustainable solution to maintaining an economically viable beef industry… Unless heavily edited, we believe the proposed rule will cause cattlemen and brand partners great economic hardships as their investment in premium genetics meet a constricted market.”

While not opposing the effort to better define terms, the letter noted, “it appears the kind of clarity being proposed negates the intent and opens the doors to a long series of lawsuits … litigation will lead to a reduction in the availability of value-based marketing arrangements.” Value separation would be minimized but “easier to defend,” the letter said.

Certified Angus Beef Board Chairman Steve Olson said, “This brand has worked for years to get ranchers premiums on their high-quality cattle through value-based marketing. Because the proposed rules may threaten these premiums, we must voice our opinion.”

The American Angus Association supports these efforts, noted Association Board Chairman Joe Hampton. “By working with Secretary Vilsack, we hope Certified Angus Beef can help insure that any changes to the existing GIPSA regulations allow for the continued expansion of quality-focused, value-based marketing options,” he said.

That’s what allows financial rewards for those who meet the growing consumer demand for products such as those bearing the Certified Angus Beef ® brand, said Association board member Leo McDonnell.

GIPSA has made it clear that its rules are not intended to “limit or eliminate the ability of companies to provide premiums to reward producers for providing certain quantity or quality of livestock,” McDonnell said  “We will continue to stay engaged to ensure GIPSA stays true to these proposed intentions and to be clear that nothing in these rules will jeopardize a premium-based market.”

“Angus producers have much at stake because we have worked hard to add value to our cattle,” Hampton said. “We’re happy to provide input to help ensure the GIPSA rules will result in a vibrant, healthy market that rewards quality and enhances opportunity and choices.”

Stika concluded, “We have a long history with USDA and much common ground in seeking a better future for producers who aim to satisfy consumer demand. We look forward to reviewing the pending USDA economic impact study, and every opportunity to discuss solutions to our concerns.”

You may also like

$100,000 Up for Grabs with 2024 Colvin Scholarships

$100,000 Up for Grabs with 2024 Colvin Scholarships

Certified Angus Beef is offering $100,000 in scholarships for agricultural college students through the 2024 Colvin Scholarship Fund. Aspiring students passionate about agriculture and innovation, who live in the U.S. or Canada, are encouraged to apply before the April 30 deadline. With the Colvin Scholarship Fund honoring Louis M. “Mick” Colvin’s legacy, Certified Angus Beef continues its commitment to cultivating future leaders in the beef industry.

Raised with Respect™ Cattle Care Campaign Launched This Fall

Raised with Respect™ Cattle Care Campaign Launched This Fall

Raised with Respect™ was developed as part of a strategic cattle care partnership between Sysco and CAB. The collaboration focuses on supporting farmers and ranchers, equipping them with continuing education to stay current on best management practices and helping to increase consumer confidence in beef production.

Drought Impact and Cattle Industry Dynamics

Drought Impact and Cattle Industry Dynamics

As drought conditions persist across much of cattle country, farmers and ranchers are at a pivotal juncture in the cattle industry’s landscape. What impact does this prolonged dry spell have on the nation’s herd numbers? When will heifer retention begin? How will industry dynamics influence the spring bull sale season?

Where’s the premium?

January 30, 2011

 

High percentage Angus calves continue to outsell non-Angus calves of similar weight and frame at livestock auctions across the U.S.

Data collected from eight cooperating markets in fall 2010 reveal steers of that breed brought $6.32 per hundredweight (/cwt.) more than their non-Angus counterparts.

That’s a $32.58/head Angus advantage for the average 516-pound (lb.) steer.

Certified Angus Beef LLC (CAB) has tracked similar patterns regionally and nationwide since 1999 through its “Here’s the Premium” study. Average premiums have trended higher for Angus genetics over the years, with the most recent figure just 47 cents/cwt. below the 2008 record spread, but on slightly heavier average weights. The Angus heifer premium over non-Angus was 44 cents/cwt. more than in 2008.

The 2010 comparison study included more than 10,000 head from nearly 600 lots; the overall database contains records on 12,721 lots and approximately 275,000 cattle from 13 states. The markets participate in the study on condition that exact locations remain confidential.

“We’ve seen the premium grow because cattle feeders have learned from experience that high-percentage Angus cattle are healthier and more profitable to feed than other types, said Steve Suther, the CAB director of industry information who initiated the study. “When they bid accordingly, there are more dollars for Angus cow-calf producers compared to those with other cattle.”

The premium has endured independent of commodity cattle market trends (note top line in historical graph).

Kevin Dhuyvetter, an agricultural economist at Kansas State University, has been providing statistical expertise from the start.

“This was the second highest Angus premium among 10 sets of fall values for steers,” Dhuyvetter said. “It was the third highest Angus premium for heifers.”

For the first eight years of the project, fall surveys compared prices for Angus and non-Angus calves weighing 400 lb. to 599 lb., and spring surveys compared those for 600 lb. -799 lb. feeders. Since 2008, the survey is only conducted every other fall. While the overall average price per head tends to increase for the lighter fall-sold calves, premiums for all Angus-influenced cattle have remained consistent and strong throughout the study.

As the last two HTP installments have shown strong Angus-influenced premiums, the average historical premium for all Angus steers in the database moved up by $2.96/head from 2008 to average $24.22 in the 2010 report.  

All calf prices were consistently $12 to $14/cwt. higher at northern and western locations, compared to the base of Oklahoma, but Kentucky calf prices averaged $5.86/cwt. lower, Dhuyvetter noted.

Auction markets from states that also include Kansas, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, California and Nebraska reported breed type, sex, weight, and price of calves personally known as Angus genetics compared to non-Angus calves on four different sale dates. One Dakota market manager said roughly 80% of the cattle sold there are high-percentage Angus; providing listings for similar but non-Angus calves is often reported as a challenge across the country.

You may also like

$100,000 Up for Grabs with 2024 Colvin Scholarships

$100,000 Up for Grabs with 2024 Colvin Scholarships

Certified Angus Beef is offering $100,000 in scholarships for agricultural college students through the 2024 Colvin Scholarship Fund. Aspiring students passionate about agriculture and innovation, who live in the U.S. or Canada, are encouraged to apply before the April 30 deadline. With the Colvin Scholarship Fund honoring Louis M. “Mick” Colvin’s legacy, Certified Angus Beef continues its commitment to cultivating future leaders in the beef industry.

Raised with Respect™ Cattle Care Campaign Launched This Fall

Raised with Respect™ Cattle Care Campaign Launched This Fall

Raised with Respect™ was developed as part of a strategic cattle care partnership between Sysco and CAB. The collaboration focuses on supporting farmers and ranchers, equipping them with continuing education to stay current on best management practices and helping to increase consumer confidence in beef production.

Drought Impact and Cattle Industry Dynamics

Drought Impact and Cattle Industry Dynamics

As drought conditions persist across much of cattle country, farmers and ranchers are at a pivotal juncture in the cattle industry’s landscape. What impact does this prolonged dry spell have on the nation’s herd numbers? When will heifer retention begin? How will industry dynamics influence the spring bull sale season?

Bar V advances with CAB

 

by Lacey Altwegg

North Dakota is home to a ranch and feedlot that targets the Certified Angus Beef ® (CAB®) brand. Bar V Ranch LTD, Jamestown, N.D., has been committed to producing high-quality Angus cattle since the 1970s. In May, the Bar V 1,500-head feedlot took that commitment to the next level.

“We decided to become a partner in the CAB Feedlot Licensing Program,” says co-owner and manager Brian Amundson. “We were already doing a lot of the same management practices, so it just made sense. Now we have better carcass data to serve our customers.” He works along with wife Jennifer and parents Van and Patty Amundson to keep Bar V Ranch running smoothly.

Paul Dykstra, beef cattle specialist with CAB, compliments Amundson’s approach to feeding and marketing his cattle. “This will be a great outlet for North Dakota producers interested in the CAB target and getting data on their cattle,” he adds.

CAB-licensed feedlots add value with management that maximizes the genetic potential of Angus-influenced cattle, Dykstra says. Coordinating nutrition and implant management practices with ranch customers allow for the best in Angus carcass quality.

The program is designed to reward producers and feedlots for high-quality cattle that meet the CAB brand specifications. Partner feedlots enroll cattle and market them to CAB-licensed packers, earning premiums for those that qualify as CAB.

Bar V Ranch joins the ranks of 64 CAB feedlots in 16 states, in a system that promotes their ability to manage for quality. “Brian wants to feed the top end of the cattle population, and this affiliation with CAB will help provide a more public presence in the beef business,” Dykstra says.

Amundson classifies his feedlot as, “small with a competitive edge.” Bar V Ranch regularly sorts cattle at reimplant or at the feeding period midpoint for optimum quality, a benefit that is not common at larger feedlots, he says.

“We are able to spend more time on sorting, receiving, processing and shipping cattle to be sure we are producing the highest quality,” Amundson says. “That allows us to target the higher end market.”

Not only does Bar V Ranch pay special attention to the needs of cattle, but also the needs of the producer. Owning cattle on feed and also operating a 400-head cow-calf business, Amundson says he can relate to producers.

“I am in the beef business,” he says. “It’s what I do every day, so I am familiar with what producers go through. We feed cattle for investors and producers, but also for ourselves, so we truly put our money where our mouth is.”

Meat case math

How retailers establish beef prices

 

by Miranda Reiman

When cattlemen put an asking price on a bull or a load of calves, they set it as high as they can reasonably hope for a sale. At an auction, the sale manager announces the target price before calling for bids. Grocers take a similar tack, but feedback is not as direct at the meat case.

“Retailers price their meat at the highest level that consumers still perceive as delivering value,” says Al Kober, veteran meat manager and retail director for Certified Angus Beef LLC (CAB).

So they’re the ones making all the money in the beef business? Not exactly, Kober says.

“There are controls, like competition,” he explains. “In a metropolitan area, a five-mile circle around a retail store could have 20 to 30 other retailers selling basically the same products.”

And consumers, just like feeders or packers, will only pay so much.

“Above a certain price point, the product won’t move anymore,” says Julian Leopold, beef industry analyst for Peterson Management. “It meets a level of resistance.” In a tight economy, consumers may be more likely to “trade down” to less expensive cuts when their favorite is priced above that certain price point, he adds.

Grocers can’t be as responsive to the markets as other industries, says Randy Irion, channel marketing director for the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA), which contracts to manage retail programs for the beef checkoff.

“They are very slow to make change in either direction,” he says. “When the wholesale price of gasoline changes, it changes at the pump pretty darn quickly. We buy gasoline not because we like it, but because we need it.”

In contrast, demand for beef can switch to other proteins or even non-meat food items.

“The retailers have to be careful to avoid a dramatic swing in prices that reflects exactly what’s going on in the market,” Irion says, noting there are also many logistics against physically adjusting all the numbers that often.

Longer-term market fluctuations—like the steady downward trend for middle meats this past year—are usually reflected in the featured advertising or the weekly sales flier, but forward contracts and printing deadlines still cause a delayed response. Retailers might get customized annual bids from packers for staple beef items, and then shop around for these “features,” which they often use to draw customers into the store.

“The retail trend would be to buy within a four- to six-week window,” Leopold says. “All the ad circulars are printed weeks before. If you came out with something really cheap today, they couldn’t use it for at least a month.”

With those time constraints, some retailers engage in less featuring when prices are extremely volatile, he adds.

In addition to regular retail and features, grocers often use meat items as their “loss leaders.” Lower-priced hams at Easter or turkeys at Thanksgiving will generate more foot traffic.

“If a retailer is going to lose 86 cents per pound (lb.) on hams, he has to make it up someplace because it’s a for-profit company,” Kober says. That’s why a tenderloin might sell for $20/lb. in the store, when the cost is only $7.50/lb. wholesale. “It’s only one tiny little muscle, about 1% of the carcass, while the chuck is about 30%,” he says.

Anatomy makes merchandizing beef more difficult than other goods.

“Unlike manufactured products, with the beef animal you’ve got to sell the whole thing to make money,” Irion says. “As they start breaking up the primals, there are some cuts that are going to be more in demand than others, but you have to move all of them.”

The more customers, the easier it is, and retailers often use meat and produce as a way to build loyalty by differentiating themselves.

“Then within fresh meat, there’s certainly more opportunity to distinguish yourself with fresh beef than other proteins, particularly like chicken and turkey that are largely case-ready anyway,” Irion says. “Retailers do that by carrying brands, but the cut selection, depth of inventory and knowledge of people behind the counter are all very important.”

Kyle Miller, CAB executive account manager and chef, works directly with retailers in the Great Lakes region. Many companies use the Certified Angus Beef ® (CAB®) brand to set themselves apart as quality-focused, and use a concept called “shadow pricing” to grow sales.

“If they sell CAB and a commodity quality grade, they’ll put them in the same ad with, say, a 50-cent price spread,” he explains. “They let people know, ‘We’ve got a hot deal on Choice ribeye steaks, but for only 50 cents more you can trade up.’

“That retailer is giving customers an opportunity for a better eating experience, plus they make more gross profit and sales dollars,” Miller says.

That added revenue is filtered back to producers.

“Getting consumers to pay more for more quality is the only way producers can get more for cattle that meet the CAB specifications,” Kober says. “At every level, they will pay more because it has intrinsic value.”

In large chains, most meat strategies are set at the corporate level, which takes into consideration the entire product mix from canned goods to toiletries.

“A retail store is very successful if it can make more than one penny per dollar (1%) average profit,” Kober says.

Retail prices aren’t based only on product cost, but must also cover the many other costs of operation and overhead to stay in business.

“Meat departments have to sell everything in the case or it’s going to spoil,” Irion says. “Everything they do is about avoiding that situation.”

Shelf life is typically three days, which includes the day of packaging.

“If it isn’t sold by the end of the second day,” Miller says, “they’ll put a discount and sticker on it, like a ‘manager’s special,’ to make it more appealing and at least get something out of it.”

Irion notes it’s a careful balance between enough inventory and overstocking, because consumers like options at the meat counter.

“If there’s only one package of ground beef, even if it looks fine, but the rest of the case is rummaged over, you might think twice about picking up the very last package,” he says. “Whereas, if it were Rice Krispies®, you’d think nothing of it because they’re all exactly the same.”

In addition to managing this kind of “shrink,” managers are constantly monitoring yield, or how much saleable product they have after trimming fat and cutting portions.

“As soon as you open that Cryovac® [brand vacuum pack] you’re incurring a loss,” Miller says, noting yields can vary anywhere from 88% on a New York strip to 50% on a tenderloin. “You’re trying to make the most money out of the product.”

Often the trim will sell as cube steak, grinds or stew meat. All of the specialized trim labor adds cost.

“When you buy a 20-count box of oranges, you get 20 oranges,” Kober says. “When you buy beef, you’ve got to break it down.”

Top sirloin butts were roughly $3.43/lb. in May.

“That’s the cost from the packer,” Kober says. There is an 11% yield loss, and then labor, benefits and overhead add up to about 15%.

“You have more than $100,000 of equipment in every store for wrapping, grinding and cutting. That has to be paid for,” he says. Throw in maintenance and you have an average 26% markup, or $4.32/lb., before any profit can be figured in.

It’s a lot of work, but beef can bring in more revenue than any other protein.

“Beef has the advantage of being the item with the highest average price,” Irion says. “Even if the margins aren’t as good, you’re going to make more dollars. Retailers need a good beef program to have a good meat program.”

Similarly, producers need good beef retailers to channel consumer demand from the meat case to cattle that hit consumer targets.

“Every segment has to be profitable, but each division must manage their own interests,” Kober says. Still, common interests are critically important. “We all need to get out of the mindset that the other people in the chain are somehow taking advantage and making all the profits. We have to realize that we all have a vested interest in keeping each segment profitable.”