Reproduction matters, Part I
A few weeks ago I attended the two-day Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle (ARSBC) Symposium, held this year at Oklahoma State University. I’ve been to ARSBC before and always find the combination of research and real-world application on the ranch valuable.
Here are some of the 2014 highlights:
- Fertility is a lowly heritable trait, but largely impacted by management. George Perry, South Dakota State University, says synchronization increases the uniformity and profitability of a calf crop due to added age (and thus weight) of artificial insemination (AI) calves. The genetic gain from proven AI sires is another bonus.
- AI doesn’t have to be complicated. Sandy Johnson, Kansas State University, shared the Beef Center Estrous Synchronization Planner (ESP). The free, downloadable Excel-based planner provides step-by-step guides to simplify protocols and schedules. It also estimates costs per pregnancy. You can even get it on your smart phone or tablet here.
- Match your herd and environment. “Seventy percent of energy to produce 1 pound of beef comes from cow maintenance,” said Dave Lalman, Oklahoma State University. He pointed to tools like the American Angus Association’s Optimum Milk Module.
- To heat up reproduction rates, cool it. Peter Hansen, University of Florida, spoke on measuring heat stress in cattle, as the long-term implications carry throughout the reproductive cycles. The normal rectal temperature range for beef cows is 101.3 F to 101.5 F. Conception rates can decline when temperatures reach 102.2 F, with an afternoon reading of 102.5 F. being “critical.” He encouraged the use of an iButton (inserted in a CIDR) for proper temperature monitoring.
- Synchronization pays. Cattlemen Roger Wann talked about his use of synchronization and fixed-time AI on his ranch in southeastern Oklahoma. “We can’t improve genetics if we can’t get cows pregnant,” Roger said. “Synchronization is the delivery method for genetic improvement.” It adds up to a $120 return per female exposed to estrous synchronization and timed AI compared to natural service—and that’s not including genetic gain.
- To easily calculate the benefits, just Cowculate. Use the AI Cowculator, that is. Cliff Lamb, University of Florida, introduced the smartphone app that helps producers determine costs and value of estrous synchronization.
Lamb re-emphasized what seemed to be a theme all day: using reproductive technology is not as difficult as it sounds – and it pays.
“Calves born earlier in the calving season stay longer in the herd and are more productive in their lifetime,” he said.
Fall intern Katy Kemp is currently pursuing a master’s degree in ag communications from Oklahoma State University. A nice coincidence, given that put her in the perfect place to cover this renowned reproduction conference. Watch for more highlights in tomorrow’s part II post.
For complete coverage of the conference, including PowerPoint presentations and audio, click here.
You may also like
Nebraska Ranch Receives Certified Angus Beef Commercial Award
Troy Anderson, managing a Nebraska ranch, focuses on breeding thriving maternal cows that will grade premium Choice and Prime, while respecting livestock, people and land. Anderson Cattle receives the 2023 CAB Commitment to Excellence Award. Their journey includes improving genetics, feeding home-raised and purchased calves and using data for better breeding decisions, all with a bottom-line approach.
Everything They Have
Progress is a necessity on the Guide Rock, Nebraska, ranch where Troy Anderson manages a commercial Angus herd, small grower yard, his 10-year-old son, and a testing environment. Troy’s approach includes respect for his livestock, people and land. For that, Anderson Cattle was honored with the CAB 2023 Commercial Commitment to Excellence Award.
Certified Angus Beef Recognizes Beef Quality Research
First-place honors go to Andres Mendizabal, an international student pursuing a Ph.D. in animal science at Texas Tech University. His research is titled, “The Accuracy of USDA Yield Grade and Beef Carcass Components as Predictors of Red Meat Yield.”