fbpx

Record beef exports despite trade challenges

 

by Miranda Reiman

If you’ve never eaten beef lips, you’re proof of this beef export truth: “It’s all about putting the right cut in the right market and maximizing what opportunity there is.”

That’s according to Dan Halstrom, president and CEO of the U.S. Meat Export Federation, who estimates 2018 was a record-high year for global sales of U.S. beef at $8.5 billion.

Divided by total harvest numbers for last year, that means exports contribute at least $320 to the value of each carcass sold.

The Certified Angus Beef ® brand doesn’t box offal or organ meats, but its sales add value to the muscle cuts, says Geof Bednar, CAB director of international.

“Where the hot markets are for U.S. beef is a benchmark for us,” he says. “Japan, Korea, Canada and Mexico are dominating our growth.”

Exports accounted for 11.1% of all U.S. beef last year, and CAB shipments outpaced that at 17.3% of sales.

“When U.S. beef loses market share, we generally don’t suffer as much,” Bednar explains. “I truly believe that’s the testament to a brand in the market.”

From extra educational sessions to marketing support, the resources a brand provides help leverage U.S. beef in places where they are craving more of a story, he says.

One example is Japan, which accounts for a quarter of all U.S. beef exports. Demand for high-quality beef has grown from the upscale, white-tablecloth market to now include the middle class, with options like rice bowls and bento boxes.

It’s true Japan has an aging population, “but they also have the highest savings rate by far in the world,” Halstrom says. “They’re able to afford high-quality products.”

Total CAB export sales grew at a record 18.6% the last fiscal year. Japan alone had a 6% increase, or 2.25 million additional pounds.

But those numbers aren’t guaranteed.

Kent Bacus, director of international trade and market access for National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA), says it’s vital the industry address the 38.5% tariff assessed on beef into Japan. Competitors like Canada, Mexico, New Zealand and others are at a significant advantage.

“The Japanese want our products, but if we don’t do something to get these trade barriers out of the way, then all of this effort could be jeopardized,” Bacus says.

Bednar says he’s seen middle meats in the country go for as much as double what they do stateside.

“I’m always amazed at the cost of the beef, by the time we ship it and add that tariff,” he says. “How do we maintain market share in that environment?”

For the brand, it includes an office in Tokyo and marketing matched to the culture, so it’s not just American resources translated to Japanese, but targeted content.

The company also relies on USMEF and NCBA applying pressure in Washington.

“There’s nothing, in my opinion, more important than getting this figured out long-term for our industry,”  Halstrom says.

Combined U.S. exports to Mexico and Canada add $70 per head, which makes the bordering countries a second-largest target for U.S. beef, and at least that strong for CAB.

“The product mix versus Asia is almost entirely different,” Halstrom says. “I hate to think what the price on our rounds would be if you didn’t have access in Mexico and Canada.”

They also buy variety meats like intestine and beef lips. 

Currently business is steady, as all three nations take the replacement of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) back to their respective legislative bodies.

“Korea is our success story. We want to keep that going,” Bacus says, noting NCBA put considerable pressure on the Trump administration. “This is just a great example of how trade agreements can really allow us to succeed and meet market demand, when we get these government restrictions out of the way.”

Looking across the globe, there is one market that provides more challenge and opportunity than any other.

“China represents a fifth of the world’s population. The middle class is bigger than the entire U.S. population,” Bacus says. But the trade situation there is uncertain, and the only beef going into the country is from non-hormone treated cattle (NHTC) programs.

China bought fairly modest amounts of U.S. beef last year, the first 11 months adding up to $55.1 million. If the trade barriers and import restrictions were all out of the way, NCBA estimates it could be a $4 billion business annually.

“Demand is not the problem at all. There’s plenty of demand,” Halstrom says, “But it’s going to take time to reintroduce U.S. beef as we get some of these trade opportunities under control.”

Meanwhile on the other side of the world, USMEF is optimistic about the future of markets in Central America, South America and Africa.

There are a billion people in Africa and it’s the youngest demographic globally, Halstrom says.

World-wide Luanda, Angola, currently has the second highest standard of living, behind Hong Kong.

“Who would have thought that? So the opportunity is there,” he says.

Aside from Nigeria, all African markets are open to U.S. trade, and livers, hearts and kidneys are the main products headed there today.

“But there are pockets in all these markets that are demanding high quality,” Bednar says, noting that business people and tourists are usually the first target. “In a market we’re developing, we’ll spend a considerable amount of time with our distributor, and foodservice is where we go first.”

Relationships matter.

“It takes going over and not only sitting in a meeting together, but eating a meal together,” Bednar says. The brand works in concert with USMEF.

Halstrom says they identify demographics willing to accept that U.S. beef will never be the cheapest product, but it can be the best.

“We want to work in regions where price is not the first item. Maybe quality is their first attention point and maybe price is second or third down the list,” he says. “When that happens, we know that we’re making progress.”  

Halstrom and Bacus spoke at Cattlemen’s College, Jan. 30, as part of the Cattle Industry Convention and Trade Show in New Orleans.

 

you may also like

$100,000 Up for Grabs with 2024 Colvin Scholarships

$100,000 Up for Grabs with 2024 Colvin Scholarships

Certified Angus Beef is offering $100,000 in scholarships for agricultural college students through the 2024 Colvin Scholarship Fund. Aspiring students passionate about agriculture and innovation, who live in the U.S. or Canada, are encouraged to apply before the April 30 deadline. With the Colvin Scholarship Fund honoring Louis M. “Mick” Colvin’s legacy, Certified Angus Beef continues its commitment to cultivating future leaders in the beef industry.

Raised with Respect™ Cattle Care Campaign Launched This Fall

Raised with Respect™ Cattle Care Campaign Launched This Fall

Raised with Respect™ was developed as part of a strategic cattle care partnership between Sysco and CAB. The collaboration focuses on supporting farmers and ranchers, equipping them with continuing education to stay current on best management practices and helping to increase consumer confidence in beef production.

Drought Impact and Cattle Industry Dynamics

Drought Impact and Cattle Industry Dynamics

As drought conditions persist across much of cattle country, farmers and ranchers are at a pivotal juncture in the cattle industry’s landscape. What impact does this prolonged dry spell have on the nation’s herd numbers? When will heifer retention begin? How will industry dynamics influence the spring bull sale season?

To add value to Angus calves, target this brand

 

by Miranda Reiman

Most cattlemen look for well-rounded genetic profiles when perusing sale books, but it can be information overload.

For those who want to emphasize carcass quality in their selection, the Certified Angus Beef ® (CAB®) brand offers a tool to help sort through data: the Targeting the BrandTM logo.

“We know today’s bull buyer is balancing a lot of different traits. The logo is a quick reference that can point you toward bulls more likely to help you raise more CAB qualifiers,” says Kara Lee, production brand manager for the brand.

Angus breeders and bull studs use that logo to identify animals that are above breed average for marbling expected progeny difference (EPD) and Angus Grid Value Index ($G). As of the spring 2019 sire summary those thresholds would be at least a +0.53 on marbling and +$34.09 or above on $G.

“Of the 10 carcass specifications, the top reason cattle fail to make it into our brand is lack of marbling,” Lee says. “The grid value takes that into account, while also including other traits of importance like adequate ribeye and the value of carcass weight.”

Previously, breeders used the logo generically on websites or sale book covers to show support of CAB. If the logo is used broadly, Lee says it should be with language such as “Click here for a list of bulls that meet Targeting the Brand genetic requirements” or “Look for this mark inside to identify bulls that will help you target CAB standards.”

Targeting the Brand is now used much like one for a genetic test would be used to denote individually tested animals.

 

Some producers may use it to make an initial sort on bulls they’re considering, or some may use it to rank those they already have on their list.

Texas cattleman Earl Wayne Reese recently used it to help identify a seedstock supplier with the kind of bulls he had in mind.

Reese already knew a thing or two about carcass data and feedlot closeouts. He’d retained ownership of his calves through finishing for years. He knew CAB was a legitimate target.

So when a Davis Angus (Foss, Okla.) catalog showed up in his mailbox, he noticed the Targeting the Brand logo right away.

“There were some particular bloodlines I wanted to use, and they had some really good data on their bulls, so I decided to go up there and see what they looked like,” Reese says.

Many animals carried the mark, so he sorted from there.

“I circle the bulls I’m interested in and I only look at those bulls,” Reese says.

He came home with six new sires.

“We try to arm people with enough information that they can make a decision on what they need for their cattle and their herd,” says Debbie Davis, who ranches with her husband, Jim, and their family.

“We can say, ‘Hey, we’ve got those cattle that can produce CAB, that can get you a premium.’ We’re aiming for the white-tablecloth crowd,” she says.

Using the bulls with the right data is only half of the value-added process, Lee says.

“If you’re producing premium feeder calves, you’ve got to match that with premium marketing,” she says. “That could be conveying more information about your calves to buyers at auction, it could mean developing a relationship with a feeder, or retaining ownership through finishing.”

For those who sell at weaning, the logo can help convey information, and hopefully add value.

For example, the Angus Link(SM) program features cattle groups that carry the Targeting the Brand logo.

They can be marketed with the logo when they average 125 or greater Grid Score and each animal is predominately black-hided. In other words, they need to be Angus type as defined by the American Angus Association’s “GLA” (Government Live Angus) specification.

“Commercial producers who use Targeting the Brand-identified bulls should have a greater chance of qualifying their calves through the Angus Link program,” Lee says.

CAB does not advocate single-trait selection, but Lee hopes this tool helps commercial cattlemen find the sires that fit all their other economically important traits while also focusing on the end users.

“It’s a tried and true quote, but it’s still as relevant today as when I first heard it: the only new dollars coming into this industry come from the consumer,” she says.

you may also like

You, Your Cows and Their Feed

You, Your Cows and Their Feed

Expert guidance from Dusty Abney at Cargill Animal Nutrition shares essential strategies for optimizing cattle nutrition during droughts, leading to healthier herds and increased profitability in challenging conditions.

Nebraska Ranch Receives Certified Angus Beef Commercial Award

Nebraska Ranch Receives Certified Angus Beef Commercial Award

Troy Anderson, managing a Nebraska ranch, focuses on breeding thriving maternal cows that will grade premium Choice and Prime, while respecting livestock, people and land. Anderson Cattle receives the 2023 CAB Commitment to Excellence Award. Their journey includes improving genetics, feeding home-raised and purchased calves and using data for better breeding decisions, all with a bottom-line approach.

Moo-ving the big rocks

by Nicole Lane Erceg

The new year now feels old once you get into a busy season like calving. There are many spans of time in cattle country that can make us feel there’s too much to do, or too little time in each day.

By now, some resolutions have fallen to the wayside, the rush of reality helping us sort out what matters most in the commitment to get better.

Yet, there are still some that rise above the rest, beat the average and make it look easy

What’s their secret?

A recent visit to a Kansas ranch gave me insight into what sets some cattlemen apart. For 20 years, these brothers focused on raising functional cattle that produced the highest quality beef possible.

Last year, their calves graded 61% Prime.

It wasn’t achieved by single-trait selection, neglecting other traits for the cow herd, or irrational management that ignored profit potential, they assured me.

It was a matter of committing with intense focus to one leading goal and all others in turn rather than just trying to do their best overall.

Have you ever heard the old quote, “A rising tide lifts all boats?”

It’s the same when we narrow our focus. Drop a handful of pebbles into a pond and you’ll only create ripples. Throw in a large boulder and the water level rises.

Once they began to see favorable results on herd goals, they realized continued focus on each goal would build momentum over time.

They just succeed by focusing on one thing at a time.

Sounds simple, but it could be a better way to look at it than trying to raise cattle with some kind of management strategy to excel on all fronts, every day. We might make some progress if we have time to analyze it. Then again, we might be over-complicating things. We might be just tossing pebbles.

You know what goes into making a Prime grading calf? An easy-calving, easy-keeping mother, a consistently proactive health program, adequate nutrition and steady genetic improvement over time.

Framed by an overarching goal that doesn’t interfere with other priorities, we can hit our quality target and improve other areas of the business simultaneously.  

Want to earn more money from your calves next year? What’s the single thing you could do that will help you get there fastest? What if you made that top priority for the next year? The next several years? Your workload may not wane, but clarity of purpose could make it seem lighter. That can make all the difference.  

Toward the end of my Kansas visit, I asked the brothers if the goal that lifted their calves to mostly Prime grade remains the same priority today.

They shook their heads no.

Having arrived at the pinnacle of quality, they consider carcass merit built in now, as long as they maintain average pressure. They’ve shifted their laser focus to the next big rock in their business: performance. Their calves must reach harvest weight faster and faster.

I’m not suggesting you decide to skip checking heifers this evening to focus instead on office work that’s fallen behind. We still need to run the business on all fronts, but what if we do that with the perspective of moving one big boulder at a time? 

you may also like

Drought Impact and Cattle Industry Dynamics

Drought Impact and Cattle Industry Dynamics

As drought conditions persist across much of cattle country, farmers and ranchers are at a pivotal juncture in the cattle industry’s landscape. What impact does this prolonged dry spell have on the nation’s herd numbers? When will heifer retention begin? How will industry dynamics influence the spring bull sale season?

Nebraska Ranch Receives Certified Angus Beef Commercial Award

Nebraska Ranch Receives Certified Angus Beef Commercial Award

Troy Anderson, managing a Nebraska ranch, focuses on breeding thriving maternal cows that will grade premium Choice and Prime, while respecting livestock, people and land. Anderson Cattle receives the 2023 CAB Commitment to Excellence Award. Their journey includes improving genetics, feeding home-raised and purchased calves and using data for better breeding decisions, all with a bottom-line approach.

Magnum Feedyard Earns Certified Angus Beef Award

Magnum Feedyard Earns Certified Angus Beef Award

While Magnum hasn’t always had pens filled with Angus-influenced cattle, they’ve invested in infrastructure, improved quality-based marketing and sought better genetics. Their dedication to detail and employee appreciation drive their success to high-quality beef production.

Decide Sooner

by Justin Sexten, Ph.D.

While many of you are in sire buying mode this time of year, more are deciding whether this year’s bull calves retain the ability to become sires.

Castration at birth is ideal, but catching them on day one can be a challenge in extensive operations. Castration at branding or turnout offers a balance between handling ease and minimizing calf stress.

Some may delay castration to increase weaning weight, and indeed, neutering at turnout along with an age-appropriate growth implant shows pre-weaning performance comparable to intact males without adding to stress at weaning. Cut-and-healed steers at weaning have a more flexible marketing window as well.

A few defer castration beyond weaning in pursuit of natural market premiums, figuring testosterone  can replace the implants banned by marketing programs. That’s a shortsighted model, considering calves castrated at weaning present a greater health risk down the road.

We’ve heard the suggestion that improved genetic potential in cattle today supports early castration without an implant while calves are nursing. That’s an interesting theory, but no current data supports such a break with technology. Could a combination of genetic improvement and environmental constraint limit calf growth before genetic or technology-supported potential is achieved?

Nearly every bull arriving intact at a feedyard is castrated, so postponing simply delays the inevitable. A recent article in “Translational Animal Science” by Ball et al from West Texas A&M and the University of Arkansas demonstrates consumer impacts of failing to make timely sire-selection decisions.

The experiment looked at feeding intact males compared to castration by banding at feedyard arrival. Performance data were not surprising. Bulls had the higher hot carcass weight at 911 pounds (lb.), compared to late-banded steers at 806 lb. The continual quest for more market weight by leaving males intact was achieved. The banded calves were not implanted at the feedyard, further contributing to this carcass weight difference.

Quality grade differences between the groups were stark. Calves harvested as intact bulls were 28% Choice and 71% Select or Standard while bulls banded at feedlot arrival were 56% Choice and 44% Select and Standard. None of the cattle achieved Prime. We don’t know percent Choice for these calves had they been managed for more age-appropriate castration, but what we do know shows a clear example of how a simple management practice can influence quality grade. It is well known that the longer calves remain bulls, the greater the reduction in quality grade.

When strip steaks from this experiment were offered to a taste panel, quality differences remained. Tenderness, juiciness and flavor were greater for steaks from banded steers than those from the bulls. Steaks from bulls were also numerically tougher on a Warner-Bratzler shear test than those from steers.

If you’re wondering why such an experiment was required to affirm what we know already about feeding bulls, let me add that one trial group looked at an experimental chemical castration method, that was unable to improve quality beyond bulls. The reason for that exploration? Growing consumer concern about painful management practices.

The beef industry has responded to consumer demand for a high-quality beef eating experience. Currently we produce more Prime, Certified Angus Beef® brand and Choice than ever before. Today, a great eating experience at the table includes consumers looking to have a greater say in how we produce beef in the future.

This report, while looking at a new management tool to address a changing consumer, provides a reminder of how fast a small change can influence eating quality. Early castration still serves as an example where best management practices extend beyond end-product quality and address the consumer’s desire to know not only the “why” but increasingly the “how.”

you may also like

Raised with Respect™ Cattle Care Campaign Launched This Fall

Raised with Respect™ Cattle Care Campaign Launched This Fall

Raised with Respect™ was developed as part of a strategic cattle care partnership between Sysco and CAB. The collaboration focuses on supporting farmers and ranchers, equipping them with continuing education to stay current on best management practices and helping to increase consumer confidence in beef production.

Drought Impact and Cattle Industry Dynamics

Drought Impact and Cattle Industry Dynamics

As drought conditions persist across much of cattle country, farmers and ranchers are at a pivotal juncture in the cattle industry’s landscape. What impact does this prolonged dry spell have on the nation’s herd numbers? When will heifer retention begin? How will industry dynamics influence the spring bull sale season?

You, Your Cows and Their Feed

You, Your Cows and Their Feed

Expert guidance from Dusty Abney at Cargill Animal Nutrition shares essential strategies for optimizing cattle nutrition during droughts, leading to healthier herds and increased profitability in challenging conditions.